It is believed the asbestos is in soil used as fill and brought in from elsewhere.
Resident Kim Hammond said she noticed men wearing white suits working in the valley opposite her house a few months ago in an area earmarked for subdivision.
She said she had spoken to the Environment Protection Authority, which said it was a Worksafe responsibility. She had also spoken to Surf Coast Shire.
Ms Hammond said Worksafe had advised her the asbestos was being removed in the proper manner.
“The EPA, Worksafe and the shire have all wiped their hands of it pretty much, and they are saying the responsibility is with the developer, Ironbridge Property Developments,” she said.
“I have sent them emails, and I have been promised a response, but they’re a mob in WA.
“I have seen kids playing on that site all weekend, people running through it, walking over it, and it’s everywhere. There’s a lot of it, not just little bits.
“I am frustrated because there’s no protection for the public even throughout the process of removal. All we had to do was hope they were complying.”
Ms Hammond said she had the asbestos tested, and it was found that there were two types of the material.
The tests were carried out by Environmental Health Solutions of Geelong West.
Andy Betz, of EHS, said the two samples of material supplied to the laboratory for identification were of two types of asbestos, chrysotile and amosite, known as white and brown asbestos.
Mr Betz said the two samples were in the form of cement sheeting, and were therefore not considered friable, which meant it could not be crumbled in one’s hands and was less dangerous.
It is believed Worksafe also confirmed the asbestos at the site as non-friable.
Surf Coast Shire Council has said it is not the shire’s area of responsibility.
A spokeswoman for the EPA said the authority was aware of the worksite and that Worksafe was keeping an eye on it but not transporting or disposing of material from the site.
“EPA controls the disposal of waste asbestos. In addition, EPA controls the transportation of waste asbestos when undertaken by a commercial contractor,” the spokeswoman said.
A spokesman for the developers asked Ms Hammond not to interfere “with something that has already been dealt with in the appropriate manner”.
“I refer you to our previous email and confirm that everything possible has been dealt with in the appropriate manner,” he said.
More info on Asbestos Training
Latest OHS news
What Participants Say
“In over 20 years of training, this was one of the best courses I’ve ever attended.”
“Great! The instructor made it interesting and enjoyable”
” We heard that AlertForce delivers one of the best courses around so the boss decided to send me to Australia from New Zealand.”
“I liked the trainer’s positive outlook and uplifting approach towards completing the long day.”
“Very competent training course. Trainer was very knowledgeable on subject.”
“AlertForce provided an excellent trainer, knowledgeable on the topic and allowed for active questioning.”
“Informative and concise training delivered at the right pace.”
“The Trainer was very engaging”
“Interesting, informative, relevant.”